
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
US Boot size
Brand Size | UK | Europe | Heel to toe (in) |
---|---|---|---|
3.5 | 2.5 | 34.5 | 21.5 |
4 | 3 | 35 | 22 |
4.5 | 3.5 | 36 | 22.5 |
5 | 4 | 37 | 23 |
5.5 | 4.5 | 37.5 | 23.5 |
6 | 5 | 38 | 24 |
6.5 | 5.5 | 38.5 | 24.5 |
7 | 6 | 39 | 25 |
7.5 | 6.5 | 40 | 25.5 |
8 | 7 | 41 | 26 |
8.5 | 7.5 | 41.5 | 26.5 |
9 | 8 | 42 | 27 |
9.5 | 8.5 | 42.5 | 27.5 |
10 | 9 | 43 | 28 |
10.5 | 9.5 | 43.5 | 28.5 |
11 | 10 | 44 | 29 |
11.5 | 10.5 | 45 | 29.5 |
12 | 11 | 46 | 30 |
13 | 12 | 47 | 31 |
14 | 13 | 48 | 32 |
15 | 14 | 49 | 33 |
16 | 15 | 50 | 34 |
Product details
About this item
- Vasque's most breathable hiking boot with abrasion-resistant air mesh panels
- GORE-TEX with Extended Comfort Technology for breathable waterproof protection
- Molded rubber toe cap
- Reflective piping
- Dual Density EVA footbed
- Vasque Exclusive Vibram Contact outsole with XSTrek Compound
Videos for similar products
Product details
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- Product Dimensions : 15 x 6 x 12 inches; 1.2 Pounds
- Item model number : Breeze 2.0 GTX-M
- Department : mens
- Date First Available : February 17, 2015
- Manufacturer : Vasque
- ASIN : B00KYM2YI0
- Customer Reviews:
Product Description
At Vasque, they are committed to making functional, innovative and aesthetic footwear that performs to the highest standards. Their ultimate goal is to make shoes that inspire you to get outdoors and embark on an adventure. Incorporating and developing new and innovative technologies into their boots is what keeps Vasque at the top of their game.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find these hiking boots extremely comfortable, able to hike 12 miles without pain, and appreciate their waterproof Gore-Tex technology that keeps feet dry in wet grass. They are durable with no break-in period needed, lightweight, and provide good arch support, with one customer noting the rigid soles' effectiveness on rough terrain. While the fit is nearly true to size, some customers mention the width runs narrow.
AI Generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find these hiking boots extremely comfortable, noting they can hike 12 miles without pain and are very supportive, with the footbed providing just the right amount of cushion.
"...These have to be the best and most comfortable boots I have ever worn...." Read more
"...My feet were never an issue all day. The boots provided confident footing during my GC hike in spite of intermittent rain throughout...." Read more
"...Overall: The Breeze 2.0 GTXs are comfortable, even with a backpack weighing around 30 lbs...." Read more
"These are the most comfortable shoes I own. I use them to hike about 40 miles each month in gravel-sand-rocky mountainous terrain...." Read more
Customers find these hiking boots to be excellent, with nice soles, and one customer mentions they performed well after two 12-mile backpacking hikes.
"These boots are awesome. I have a pair for daily use (castlerock color), and I have a pair for hiking (slate brown color)...." Read more
"...Either way, the boots are great...." Read more
"...the Vibram sole, the list goes on and on, this has proven to be an amazing boot...." Read more
"This review is not just for men, ladies read on as well. These hiking boots are great!..." Read more
Customers find these hiking boots durable, noting they require no break-in period and are extremely well made, with one customer mentioning they held up well in Afghanistan deployment conditions.
"...The rest of the boot is in excellent condition. None of the stitching is coming apart, and the leather still looks great even though it has gotten..." Read more
"...This seem like I can go longer between swapping. I hope the trend holds up in warmer weather. Durability: So far they seem fine...." Read more
"...With the Gortex lining, the attractive design, the craftsmanship, durability, the Vibram sole, the list goes on and on, this has proven to be an..." Read more
"...FOOT PROTECTION IS GOOD STRONG AND LETS YOUR FEET TRANSPIRE.. THEY ARE PRETTY NEW, BUT THEY ARE VERY CHINESE,,,CHEAPLY MADE,,,!!!..." Read more
Customers praise the boots' waterproof features, noting they keep feet dry in wet grass and remain totally dry inside, with the Goretex technology working effectively.
"...When water was no higher than the sole, completely dry. When water was slightly higher than the sole but lower than the top of the foot, still dry...." Read more
"...I've even been caught on my motorcycle in the rain with it. My feet have remained dry...." Read more
"...GOOD PROTECTION FROM WATER BUT DO NOT KNOW HOW LONG IT MAY LAST,, FOOT PROTECTION IS GOOD STRONG AND LETS YOUR FEET TRANSPIRE....." Read more
"...They're waterproof and the treads are really grippy - even hiking up a shale stream that was pretty much covered with slippery algae, I didn't have..." Read more
Customers find these hiking boots surprisingly light on their feet, with a thick sole that provides good support.
"...Durability: So far they seem fine. The sole is thick enough to where I haven't felt rocks even with a backpack and they haven't shown any wear and..." Read more
"...Better than running shoes by a factor of 2. Lightweight, too!" Read more
"...This boot is light, durable, well-made, and quite attractive. So far, I've worn it in the rain several times...." Read more
"...They're lightweight and I felt really agile in them, which I think is my favorite part...." Read more
Customers appreciate the ankle support of these hiking boots, noting they provide good arch support, with one customer mentioning the rigid soles offer excellent stability on rough terrain.
"...My feet were never an issue all day. The boots provided confident footing during my GC hike in spite of intermittent rain throughout...." Read more
"...They're lightweight and I felt really agile in them, which I think is my favorite part...." Read more
"...The rigid soles provide great support over rough/rocky terrain...." Read more
"...the tread is thick and grippy, the boot overall is stable with good roll over support, and a nice hard rubber skirt around the toe to protect that..." Read more
Customers like the appearance of these hiking boots, finding them decent and cool-looking, with one customer specifically appreciating the leather's durability.
"...None of the stitching is coming apart, and the leather still looks great even though it has gotten wet a few times...." Read more
"...Cool & Light?: I'd say yes. They did accomplish the goal of moving to a noticeably lighter weight boot. They do fine on the airflow part also...." Read more
"...With the Gortex lining, the attractive design, the craftsmanship, durability, the Vibram sole, the list goes on and on, this has proven to be an..." Read more
"...STURDY NOT FLEXIBLE, NOT UGLY AT ALL, LOOK VERY GOOD AND STRONG,,,..." Read more
Customers have mixed experiences with the boots' fit, with some finding them nearly true to size and appreciating the wide sizing options, while others report that the width runs narrow and the boots are too snug.
"...Plenty of toe box room for that. I also have a 12 arch and 11 length foot, so I fit for the arch. That also increases toe room for me...." Read more
"...way too tight and after further inspection I saw that they were marked "N" narrow, so I contacted Moosejaw Vi Chat and asked to send them back, they..." Read more
"...Again the width for me perfect but I can see where it would be tight on a man's foot. The boots offer warmth as well...." Read more
"...Time will tell with that. They fit nicely right out of the box although I did notice that the toe box seemed a bit tight and tended to push in on..." Read more
Reviews with images

Durable Comfortable Boots - A Fat Man's Review
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2014Vasque Breeze 2.0 GTX Boot
This is a 2 part review, the first part is for the boots and the 2nd part is a review of the seller.
These have to be the best and most comfortable boots I have ever worn.
Fit is perfect right out of the box, there is no break in time.
This is my 2nd pair , my first pair of Vasque Breeze GTX Boots were great for several months, however my feet did get slightly wet when backpacking the Pinchot Trail in scattered snow.
Also after several months of everyday use they developed a ripple on the left side of my left boot at the ball of my foot. It felt like walking with a penny in my boot.
They seemed to wear a bit much more than they should have, like chunks of the side of the sole were coming off
These were purchased from Moosejaw as well and I sent them back, under a possible warranty issue, so we will see what happens.
My second pair I ordered from Mooesejaw and ordered the wide, well they sent me a pair on Narrows in a wide box plus the boots were of the old style of Vasque Breeze GTX Boots not the Vasque Breeze 2.0 GTX Boots, they were sent back and we will see what happens (covered in the 2nd part of the review).
I finally found a pair and ordered through Amazon from Vasque
I have been wearing them for several weeks in snow, cold and rain. They are much better than the original Breeze boots.
Their sizing on the Boot has letters
N=Narrow M=Regular W=Wide, simple huh! Well not really, the order # for a 9 wide is "9 2E US".
OK back to the boots I just finished up a camping trip in the Delaware State Forest and temps were as low as 15° and 4" of snow, my feet never got cold nor did they get wet.
I plan on getting another pair for everyday use.
These boots run a tad small and a tad narrow.
If you have regular width feet I would consider the wide. I would also add half a size to length, especially if you plan on wearing thicker socks.
Customer service is prompt, I wrote them asking how their shoes were marked and hot a reply in a few days.
Letter from Vasque
Hi,
Our medium with would be labeled as a M.
The difference between a narrow and medium width is 1/16th of an inch.
The difference between a medium and wide width is another 1/16th of an inch.
Sincerely,
Consumer Relations
(800) 733-9464
Red Wing Shoes |314 Main Street |Red Wing, MN 55066
2nd part of review (The review is hard to follow because of limited formatting on amazon, below is a link to my review that makes reading much easier, just copy and past into your browser.
[...]
This part of the Review is for the place the item was purchased from, Moosejaw. If you do not plan on purchasing from Moosejaw, this part of the review is very long and not necessary, but if you plan on ordering from Moosejaw...read on!
One of the hardest things to do is write an unbiased bad review because the person writing the review is basing it on their perception of how the events transpired.
I will try and keep this as true to factual as possible.
This review is for the seller, not the Manufacturer which in this case is Moosejaw. I did not want to tarnish a quality product with a company that has sub par customer service.
First off let me start off by saying Moosejaw is a little bit pricier than other on line retailers this is my personal opinion and I find that acceptable as they have a pretty good selection.
Shipping and customer service are great when ordering and they are very accommodating, but buyer beware if you have to send something back.
When reading reviews for Moosejaw or any other online retailer, look to see if any are reviews based on returns...DO NOT READ REVIEWS ON THEIR WEBSITE, THEY ARE BIASED.
Before I start the review, here are two excerpts from their website.
(Taken from website)
Moosejaw has the best return policy in the world, according to the owner's mom. We will accept your purchase back at anytime as long as the product is in sellable condition. This excludes underwear, bras, food, climbing gear like a harness and carabiner, gift cards and e-gift certificates, all of which are final sale and cannot be returned.
Proof of purchase required for all returns. IF YOU RETURN THE PRODUCT(S) IN UNSELLABLE CONDITION we will ship the product back to you and will NOT PROVIDE YOU WITH A REFUND. Sorry about the all caps thing. It was probably unnecessary.
So basically you are at their mercy and YOU need to have 100% trust in them to give your return a fair rating.
You will have to pay shipping for the return.
(Taken from website)
You can either bring your product(s) and your invoice to a Moosejaw shop or you can mail the product(s) back to us and we'll credit your card right away. To mail the product(s) back to us, simply click below to create a new prepaid return label (offer available only to USA customers). The $7.95 will be deducted from your refund upon receipt. UPS takes about 5-7 business days to get your package back to us. We will credit you within 5 business days of receiving your package and email you a receipt confirming the credit
OK back to the review FOR Moosejaw,
I ordered a pair of Vasques Breeze 2.0 GTX Boots in a wide, I received the boots and the box was marked wide.
When I opened the box I noticed that they were last years model not the 2.0.
I figured no biggie let me try them on, after trying them on, I decided that they were way too tight and after further inspection I saw that they were marked "N" narrow, so I contacted Moosejaw Vi Chat and asked to send them back, they said no problem.
So I packaged everything up including the paperwork and the little shoe inserts and sent them back.
But to make sure I was correct on the "N" meaning narrow, I contacted Vasque by email as pointed out earlier in this review.
I contacted Moosejaw via chat a week later to check on my refund as I want to order another pair in a wide (they are out of wides) and the boots were not received yet.
Here is the Chat transcript:
Curious G: Dr. Curious G at your service. How can I help you?
ME: Hello, I'm hoping you can help me
ME: first I'll tell you my story
Curious G: Sure
ME: I purchased a pair of vasques boots 9 regular last year and they were ok for several monts but developed a wierd ripple that became uncomfortable (sent back to you guys to look at)
ME: I just ordered a pair of 9 wide and have been wearing them for two days
ME: These feel a bit tight to wear my toes, primarily on my left foot are smooshed.
ME: I 'm leary of ordering a 9.5 wide because the boot on my right foot feels perfect.
ME: any advice?
Curious G: That is really your call Richard. You're the one who will be wearing them around and you know what comfort you're going for. And what thinkness socks you prefer.
ME: I wear wool socks, slightly thicker tahn cotton
Curious G: Gotcha
ME: are the 9.5 wider, I know they are longer but are they slightly wider, as the length does not seem to be the issue
Curious G: They should be the same wdith unless indicated as a WIDE show
Richard Leyden: so a 9.5 wide is the same width as a 9 wide?
Curious G: What is your order #? I can pull it up here
ME: ? its not under my account of Richard Leyden
ME: and paperwork is at home, Im at my office
Curious G: Email used on the order?
ME: xxxxxxxx@gmail.com
ME: do they have a boot wider than a regular wide?
Curious G: Like on the website I can see there is an option for a size 8 and a size 8 wide.
Curious G: As an example.
ME: can you tell me wast numbers are for the 9 wide so I can confirm my boots are wides?
Curious G: We have no 9 or 9 wide in stock at the moment. Sorry.
Curious G: But the order indicated you have a 9 wide.
ME: what is the reference # indicating a wide on the boot?
Curious G: 490734
ME: the boot says 7466N I just want to confirm these are wides because they feel tighter than my last pair that were regular wide
ME: also says 9N
Curious G: I wonder in the N stands for Narrow. The order shows the manufacturer # as 7466W
ME: THEY SEEM JUST AS WIDE BUT TIGHTER AS MY LAST PAIR OF REGULAR... HOW CAN WE FIND OUT
ME: SOrry for the dam caps lock lol
ME: i wasnt yelling
Curious G: All good!
Curious G: I am not sure without seeing the boots honestly. I do see narrow as an option at the moment but it is possible.
ME: : hold on one second
Curious G: ok
ME: you are correct... looks like they sent me a narrow. Boot Width Definitions This is basically how the boot width system translates into plain English: D & R = Standard/Regular width boot E & W = Wide boot EE = Extra wide boot C & N = Narrow boot
Curious G: It is unfortunately possible.
ME: Im sort of relieved as Now I know its not me going nuts. Now what can we do to fix this?
Curious G: At this time we are totally sold out of 9 and 9 wide.
ME: ok so what can I do?
Curious G: you're welcome to return them for a refund.
ME: Thats great, but I also need a boot replacement
Curious G: Unfortunately at this time we do not have the inventory to exchange for the same boot.
ME: are there any similar options and if not how long will it take to get a wide 9?
Curious G: I wish I could pin down an answer for you, but I actually don't have access to that kind of info. It's kind of like a FBI file and, as a doctor, I don't have the special clearance needed to view it. I totally wish I was a spy.
Curious G: As soon as new inventory comes in, I do know we get it added to the site pretty quickly, though.
Curious G: I'd recommend checking back in a week or two.
ME: what should I do with these boots I dont want to wear on them and return?
Curious G: I'd return them if they are the wrong fit.
Richard Leyden: OK I guess that's my only recourse, will I still be able to get the 99.99 price for these when they become available?
Curious G: We can honor that, yes
ME: ok i guess ill send these back and get some Kmart specials until I can get the right size. What do I need to send these back?
Curious G: You can generate a hassle-free return label right here.
ME: will do, thanks
Curious G: Sure thing Richard!
ME: I will check back in two weeks to check, is there a direct website for this manufacturer that you know of?
Curious G: Vasque.com
ME: I will contact them as well to double check on everything, thanks again
Curious G: anytime!
I had also sent a pair back for their inspection that were older, per their request, I was told it may be covered under a warranty. This pair was sent back about 10 days earlier than the new pair. I wasn't looking for a refund on these and made that clear to Moosejaw, but more or less I was looking for an answer as to why the boot had developed a nasty ripple in the sole by the left side of the foot, it felt like a penny in your shoe.
Like I said I wasn't looking for a refund but before I invested another $160.00 I wanted to make sure this wasn't a design problem with these boots.
I contacted Moosejaw via chat another week later to check on my refund as I want to order another pair in a wide (they are still out of wides) the boots were received by Moosejaw.
I asked about the refund (on the wrong sized boots, not the warranty pair) and was told a refund was issued, so I said where was it issued, I was told it was issued as a store credit, now before I go off on the refund, I wanted to point out that I was never notified in any shape, way or form of the credit, it also does not show up on my account with Moosejaw.
I would have been more than happy just having them replace the boots with the correct ones, but at this point, my trust in Moosejaw has been seriously tarnished.
After I heard that I was getting a store credit I said NO I want a refund to my credit card because they don't even have the correct size I needed, then I was told that the boots were muddy and could not be resold, (hmmmm where did i hear the same exact thing from before, oh yeah, Backcountry.com) I swear they must say everything is muddy. I said, "this is your problem and you need to fix it" her reply was, "it's out of my hands, please call and talk to a manager".
Anyhow after 15 minutes of arguing on the chat I called Moosejaw, same thing argued for 15 minutes and was told they were sent in unacceptable, muddy and worn, I guess I better get the mud out of my living room because that's all them boots saw for two days.
So I asked the woman if they could be confusing the warranty pair with the new pair, She said no, I really wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt but they weren't budging and were so adamant that they were correct.
Now I know exactly what I sent in but I believe the problem lies in their system where the customer service rep is relying on what another individual has entered into their system.
If I was a betting man, I would say that they got the boots mixed up!
I don't want to be harsh and call them liars, but I will say that they were not willing to give me the benefit of the doubt.
This is a unique case and I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and chalk this up to a little confusion.
Still no refund so I contacted them again via chat
You are now chatting with the one, the only, Doctor 'Curious G'
Curious G: Dr. Curious G at your service. How can I help you?
rich: checking on two refunds for boots
Curious G: order #?
rich: no order # and my order does not show up on my account, try my email XXXXXX@gmail.com
Curious G: I found one order under that account for a pair of boots that was credited on 2/4
Curious G: There is also an order through amazon that was credited 2/3
rich: yes that was credited to my credit card, there is another pair that were sent in a few weeks prior to that pair under a possible warranty, I spoke to Autumn at customer service at moosejaw and she said both credits would show up this was 2/3
rich: where did that amazon credit get applied to?
Curious G: Back through amazon.
rich: what do you mean back to Amazon?
Curious G: It is credited back through your amazon account.
rich: my amazon is linked to mt checking and I do not see any credit, could you pleas elaborate?
Curious G: Credits are made back through the original form of payment. I see a $99 credit through Amazon.
rich: is there any documentation or anything I can use to contact Amazon, because there is no credit showing anywhere?
Curious G: I can forward the invoice to you
rich: if that shows the refund, please send it so I can contact Amazon, thanks
Curious G: I will be to you within 24 hours.
rich: are you emailing it to xxxxxxxx@gmail.com?
Curious G: yes
rich: thank you, you have been a great help
I received the invoice and it does not show where the money went it only says
Amazon, however my Amazon account is linked to my Checking Account, So I'm calling BS on these guys.
The folks at Moosejaw have been making me jump through hoops on this refund.
The chat sounded odd so I contacted Amazon.
AMAZON Chat
Amazon:Hello, my name is Apoorv .I'll be glad to help you today.
Me:thank you
Amazon:May I confirm the order ID, please?
Me:xxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxx
Me:I was told by Moosejaw that I was refunded on 2/3 through Amazon but I don't see it... Is there a lag from Manufacturer Refund to posting the refund.
Amazon:I do see that this order is fulfilled by the third party seller so to get a refund issued, we need to contact the seller. I do see that this item is in transit. Do you want to cancel this order?
Me:They said it was refunded on 2/3 how can it be in transit, I returned them 2 months ago?? heres a transcript of the chat with Moosejaw a few minutes ago
Amazon:Oh Yes, it is for 2013. I am so sorry for the cofusion.
Me:Insert chat transcript from moosejaw here (see above)
Me:yes i'm completely confused also
Amazon:Have you returned this item to the seller?
Me:yes a few months ago
Amazon:Let me contact the seller right away on your behalf.
Me:actualy the date was 1/03/14
Amazon:They'll have to respond you within 2 business days or we'll file a claim against the seller.
Me:well they are telling me I was already credited.
Amazon:Have they issued a Promotional credit instead of a refund?
Me:Here is the Fedex tracking# for the boots 9612137 0267934 17057054
no, it says in the chat transcript that it was credited back to Amazon this was also confirmed via phone call to their customer service.
Amazon:Let me contact the seller right away and reprt about this. If the seller do not issue a refund within 2 business days, please feel free to contact us and we'll take care of your issue a get the refund issued.
Me:Thankyou, I just want to be done with this, I have been going back and forth with these guys with no luck and sorry to say they lost a customer.
Do you need any more info from me?
How can I email this chat to myself for future reference?
Amazon:I am sending a confirmation email right away. And if the seller do not respond within 2 business days, please feel free to contact us and we'll file a claim against the seller.
Me:I had a hard time finding the chat link, is there a direct link I can use?
Amazon:I've sent the confirmation email to your inbox, you can go ahead and check your inbox.
Me:got it, thanks, I really appreciate the help
Amazon:You're welcome. Is there anything else I can help you with today?
I received a letter from Amazon shown below.
AMAZON Letter
Amazon: Hello,
We've been contacted by a customer regarding the order identified below.
--------------------
Order#: XXX-XXXXXXX-XXXXXXX
Item: Vasque Men's Breeze GTX Waterproof Hiking Boot,Beluga/Gunmetal,9 M
Reason: Returns and Refunds
ME: Details: I was told by Moosejaw that I was refunded on 2/3 through Amazon but I dont see it... Is there a lag from Manufacturer Refund to posting the refund.
They said it was refunded on 2/3
Two days after I contacted Amazon the refund was credited to my bank.
Will I ever order from Moosejaw again... absolutely not, there are way too many other options and I learn quick.
Will I ever suggest Moosejaw to another person... absolutely not!
One of the main reasons I would never shop Moosejaw is that they sent an out dated boot in a new box, the boots inside were not only the older version but they were also a narrow and as you can see by the box they are marked Breeze 2.0 at a wide size, I wish I had taken a pic of the actual boots.
So either
A) They have a very poor Quality control.
or
B) They knew exactly what they are doing and are unscrupulous (I hate to think this is true)
Putting the "refund issue" and "unacceptable for resale" issues aside, I think either of the reasons A or B mentioned above, are enough for me to not buy from Moosejaw!
References
Here's a review I found on line with a similar issue!
8/16/2013
Ordered a pair of Keens from their website. When they arrived it was clear that they sent me an older version of the boot. On their website, they falsely advertised the boot showing pictures of the newest version. Upon further investigation I discovered that the SKU number and model number on my receipt did not match the numbers on my order order confirmation or on the website.
When I contacted Moosejaw about this issue, they did not own up to the claim and tried to give me the run-around. Though, eventually they gave me a full refund.
Still unsure, don't take my word for it, read some of these reviews
Here
Here
Here
- Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2017These boots are awesome. I have a pair for daily use (castlerock color), and I have a pair for hiking (slate brown color).
The daily use boots are holding up well. The only significant wear is at the strike point of the heel. Considering most of my walking is on concrete or asphalt, the wear is about what I would expect at close to two years old. The rest of the boot is in excellent condition. None of the stitching is coming apart, and the leather still looks great even though it has gotten wet a few times. That said, there is one side note on the castlerock color. It initially had a purely gray tone, but over time it seems to have garnered a bit of an olive hue. I don't mind, but it might matter to some.
The hiking boots are great. I have hiked many miles in them, including a 17 miler into and out of the Grand Canyon. My feet were never an issue all day. The boots provided confident footing during my GC hike in spite of intermittent rain throughout. My feet also remained mostly dry and warm. In spite of mud and dust accumulating on the boots at various times while hiking, I have never thoroughly cleaned these boots except for the tread. Instead I have allowed other wet days and conditions to clean them, and they still look great.
By way of size, I take an 11 in sneakers that do not offer wide. I take a 10-10.5 when wide is an option. For these boots I went with a 10.5 to allow more room for thicker hiking socks. I can even wear my ASO ankle brace with them should I need to.
I also replaced the original insole with a higher performance insole, but I do this with every show I own.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 8, 2013Hey Everybody. Want to give my thoughts on the Vasque GTX 2.0 hiking boot.
I'm a big Vasque fan and own a pair of their backpacking boots which after putting around 400 miles on them over some tough terrain, I have to say they are the best that I've ever owned. But, it's time to replace and was hoping for something a little lighter, thus the 2.0 GTXs come into play.
Size: I almost always wear a size 11, probably at least 90% of the time, but maybe I'm a tweener. I started off ordering an 11 and my toes bumped horribly even with crew socks. So, unless you're sure that you run on the small side of a size, try to find a place to try them on first. I had them replaced with a 11.5 and they fit better. It seemed that the width was a little narrow, but after a couple weekend hikes, they have either broken in or I've quit noticing.
Arc Tempo: The Arc Tempo kind of tilts your foot forward giving you a little momentum into your next step. Ok, I like it, but I also wonder if that could have been the reason for the toe bumping in the size 11s. Since my foot is tilted forward it would naturally want to slide to the end. That's just speculation on my part. Regardless, I like the idea of assisting me with each step.
Comfort: Well, I've only worn them on 2 hikes, one 18 miler and one 26 miler. They seem reasonable comfortable and broke in quickly. I had a couple of minor annoyances on the first hike around the collar, but since I didn't notice them on the second hike, I attribute that to the break-in. A little more padding would be nice, but no worse than any other booth that I tried out. Maybe a pair of insoles will fix that.
Waterproof?: There's the question. I'll have to go with mostly. Got caught in a couple of showers on the first hike, stayed dry as expected. On the second hike, there were many water crossings where rock hopping was a must. When water was no higher than the sole, completely dry. When water was slightly higher than the sole but lower than the top of the foot, still dry. But, once the water covered the entire foot, and I'm not talking about the collar around the ankle, I took in a some water. I don't know why. They're gore-tex, so again speculating, I wonder if some water got in through the seam where they sew the gore-tex to fit the boot. Eventually, I hit water that was above the boot and naturally they were wet from then on, since you can't waterproof that situation Anyway, I think you're fine in rain or low level water, be careful covering the entire foot.
Cool & Light?: I'd say yes. They did accomplish the goal of moving to a noticeably lighter weight boot. They do fine on the airflow part also. Normally, on long hikes I swap my between two pairs of wool socks around every three hours. I wear one while the other hangs on my backpack since dry socks will reduce your blisters greatly. This seem like I can go longer between swapping. I hope the trend holds up in warmer weather.
Durability: So far they seem fine. The sole is thick enough to where I haven't felt rocks even with a backpack and they haven't shown any wear and neither has the rest of the boot, but it's still early. I have a 3 week hike coming up on the AT here shortly. If I have any problems there, I'll update my review.
Overall: The Breeze 2.0 GTXs are comfortable, even with a backpack weighing around 30 lbs. I like the way the sole slightly tilts you forward into your next step. The grip seems fine and I haven't noticed any slipping on rocks or damp surfaces - although I can tell that the grip is not quite as aggressive as the Vasque backpacking boot. I'm slightly disappointed on the waterproofing and sizing. So, although not completely blown away by the Breeze, I do recommend them as a safe and solid choice.
Minor Update:
Just finished a little over a two hundred miles on the A.T.
The good: I must have kicked a hundred rocks and never felt more than a bump on the toes. No visible sign of wear. There were some complaints on the previous version of this boot about the glue not holding, but all is good for me so hopefully that was corrected with this updated offering. Caught in a few days of rain and with rain pants covering the collar, I was able to keep dry feet. No blisters until day 18, and they were minor. That may or may not be the case for you since everybody's fit is probably a little different. Since most fellow hikers got blisters sooner, I felt fortunate.
The not so good: They are a bit narrow and even though I went up a half size, I still banged my toes on the downhills. I think I could have gone up a full size since I use thicker wool socks. If you don't have the opportunity to try them on first, I'd suggest going up at least a half size. A little more info about the traction. On steep, rocky, wet descents all was fine if I planted my foot before shifting all of my weight onto it. They did as good as most out there, in fact, probably better than most. But I still missed my old Vasque boots which had the wider toe box and were more forgiving because of the more aggressive tread similar to the current Vasque Bitterroot or Summit. But those will cost you a few more dollars and an extra pound of weight.
I'll stay with my 4 star rating and recommendation as a solid, safe choice. Again, try them on first if you can. Hope this helps and good luck out there.
Top reviews from other countries
-
Cliente de AmazonReviewed in Mexico on November 4, 2018
5.0 out of 5 stars La comodidad de las botas
En lo personal me agradó la forma de la bota, como el color, la comodidad. excelente producto
- CurtisReviewed in Canada on April 6, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Worth buying twice
Great pair of boots. I bought these same boots 3 or 4 years ago and they finally started to show signs of ware. They lost their waterproofing after about 2 and 1/2 years but the tread is still great and the seams are holding just fine. I bought these new ones as my main hiking boots and the old ones I’m still wearing more as an everyday use.
-
Luis SalazarReviewed in Mexico on January 22, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Cumple con la descripción
Me sorprendió la comodidad de la plantilla pues se siente muy suave como si la suela fuera completamente de goma espuma amortiguando muy bien la pisada, comprobe la impermeabilidad de la membrana GORETEX sumergiendo en una cubeta de agua por cinco minutos y el agua no paso, antes las había usado en una caminata en día frió y con pasto húmedo y la plantilla estaba mojada al final de la caminata por lo que lo atribuyo al sudor del pie y no a la humedad exterior, me preocupa que se despeguen por que la unión de la suela con el zapato se ve muy frágil y un poco levantado en algunas partes, la suela vibram se daño en la primer semana de uso ligero mientras las amoldaba a mi pie (tercer foto).
Luis SalazarCumple con la descripción
Reviewed in Mexico on January 22, 2019
Images in this review
- Alex LReviewed in Canada on October 19, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars A bit pricey for what it is, but much better than having to buy the 3.0 version
Exactly what I was looking for. Replaced my existing boots since I loved them so much.
- IMReviewed in Canada on February 24, 2019
3.0 out of 5 stars Good Boot
Not as comfortable as the Vasque boots that eventually wore out (closest style to the style I like best but that was discontinued). Other than that comparison, works well.